<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Business Advisor: Social CRM &amp; Enterprise 2.0 - Latest Comments in Targeted Advertising Works</title><link>http://jmorganmarketing.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jmorganmarketing.disqus.com/targeted_advertising_works/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:47:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Targeted Advertising Works</title><link>http://www.jmorganmarketing.com/targeted-advertising-works/#comment-1701591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Scot&lt;br&gt;I agree that certainly would become a problem (on 2 counts).  I'm curious to find out if ProFlowers has received any negative feedback for this type of advertising.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacobmorgan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:47:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Targeted Advertising Works</title><link>http://www.jmorganmarketing.com/targeted-advertising-works/#comment-1701593</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Might become a problem if Lindsay were now dead or if Lindsay had cheated on you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scot</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:46:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Targeted Advertising Works</title><link>http://www.jmorganmarketing.com/targeted-advertising-works/#comment-1701592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I figured you had already sent something to her before through ProFolowers as otherwise I would find that a rather disturbing email... otherwise, definitely a good job for marketing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Demerzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:30:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>