-
Website
http://www.jmorganmarketing.com -
Original page
http://www.jmorganmarketing.com/wired-magazine-bad-advice-quit-blogging/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Ari Herzog
35 comments · 23 points
-
jacobmorgan
590 comments · 4 points
-
Sachendra Yadav
5 comments · 1 points
-
DrewGneiser
14 comments · 1 points
-
Eric Pratum
21 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Strategic Principles for Enterprise 2.0 Implementation
3 days ago · 8 comments
-
Should ROI be the Only Driving Factor for Enterprise 2.0?
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Collaboration in the 2.0 Enterprise
1 week ago · 10 comments
-
Top 10 Reasons to Travel
4 days ago · 2 comments
-
The New Enterprise 2.0 Community Manager
2 weeks ago · 10 comments
-
Strategic Principles for Enterprise 2.0 Implementation
I just started a blog 2 weeks ago. I will not be shutting down. Sorry, Paul.
yep, it is a bit ironic that a blog is telling you to shut down your blog isn't it? I dont think paul really thought about his post before he wrote it. it sounds like he is having trouble managing a large blog and dealing with comments. however, managing that and completely shutting down a blog are 2 different things. It would have been better for him to give advice on how to deal with negative feedback or standout from the spam content out there.
Congrats on the new blog! and im glad you're not shutting it down.
thanks for reading and commenting bill, great to hear from you
It's amuses me that they are telling me to stop blogging on a blog. It's like when people announce they are leaving twitter forever on twitter. And I should stop blogging because Calacanis did? Puhleez ...
The article also smacks of early adopter-itis. "Well, we were blogging 4 years ago and now it's becoming mainstream so it's time to move on."
There is an awful lot of crap out there and spammers and trolls but that doesn't mean we should stop what we're doing - especially if we enjoy it.
And no one has ever left a comment on my site telling me to suck mccain's ass. I kinda wish someone would (now, don't run over there and do that Jacob :-) because it would make me laugh so hard.
oh, and you have a new comment on your blog :)
thanks for stopping by again!
i really think the article was written as a piece of linkbait. having said that it is always a good idea to discuss both sides of the issue, however paul was very one sided and superficial in his post.
it did spark some interesting discussions though, but the advice, especially during our current economic times, was stupid.
thanks for reading and commenting!
My comment to Paul,
I was sad upon the reading your article in Wired, http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/magaz... titled,
Twitter, Flickr, Facebook Make Blogs Look So 2004
I HOPE that you aren't serious about people expressing their selves in word. It reminds me of people that are frustrated with change and growth that happens to all forms of art and technology. Keep on writing Paul. Stop worrying about everyone else. We are just as frustrated as you but, never tell anyone to quit, that would keep us from discovering a better way of doing what we do.I do not in any way represent the writers of the blog world but, I do read and if you tell them to stop writing I would be out of entertainment and would have to start writing and blaming you for all the gloom and doom. Please don't write so sad and critical of us non writers trying to find our way in blogging. Some of us are just slow and late bloomers that may surprise you one day and quote your article about how it inspired us to not do what you suggested and become happy and successful despite your advice.
thanks for sharing and well said. as i mentioned to chris above, i really think the article was written as a piece of link bait (hope it was). reading the post and thinking about it is like telling people to stop eating because they're going to get fat. it just doesnt make any sense.
i wonder if he got enough hugs as a child...
thanks for reading and commenting!
it was wasn;t it? almost make he hesitant to call it advice, more like verbal abuse.
thanks for the comment chuck
yep i agree, there wasn't much value in that article. it neglects the other elements that need to be incorporated for social media. i mean, i really can't think of a single person who has JUST a blog without a facebook, twitter, linkedin, etc.
let's hope nobody heeds his advice :)
thanks for reading and commenting fran!
ITS VERY USEFUL
THANK YOU..........
Now, if all I'm looking for is a chance to get Internet Famous then, yes, I'd better be out in front of the crowd. But if I'm looking for a chance to have interesting discussions with people then I'll choose the medium that best facilitates that according to my needs.
couldn't agree with you more and wired should have done a much better job with article, i still find it amusing that a blog is telling bloggers to stop blogging, where's the sense in that?
blog on!
thanks for reading and commenting john
thanks for the comment!
there are different types of blogging yes, but i dont think it's fair to say that personal blogging will die and will shift to business blogging. businesses will use it for business and individuals will use it for their own thoughts.
some of the top blogs out there are personal individual blogs or collections of interesting thoughts and ideas that people put together. building a personal brand is an individual blog, just like this one.
im convinced that the article was just a pure piece of linkbait, i corresponded with seth godin on this and he agrees that the wired article is way off and was just used as a way to get readers and links.
thanks for the comment!